Choice

The Content Based Router from the EIP patterns allows you to route messages to the correct destination based on the contents of the message exchanges.

image

Choice options

The Choice eip supports 4 options, which are listed below.

Name Description Default Type

description

Sets the description of this node.

String

disabled

Whether to disable this EIP from the route during build time. Once an EIP has been disabled then it cannot be enabled later at runtime.

false

Boolean

when

Sets the when nodes.

List

otherwise

Sets the otherwise node.

OtherwiseDefinition

precondition

Indicates whether this Choice EIP is in precondition mode or not. If so its branches (when/otherwise) are evaluated during startup to keep at runtime only the branch that matched.

false

Boolean

Example

The Camel Simple language is great to use with the Choice EIP when routing is based on the content of the message, such as checking message headers.

  • Java

  • XML

  • YAML

from("direct:a")
    .choice()
        .when(simple("${header.foo} == 'bar'"))
            .to("direct:b")
        .when(simple("${header.foo} == 'cheese'"))
            .to("direct:c")
        .otherwise()
            .to("direct:d");
<route>
    <from uri="direct:a"/>
    <choice>
        <when>
            <simple>${header.foo} == 'bar'</simple>
            <to uri="direct:b"/>
        </when>
        <when>
            <simple>${header.foo} == 'cheese'</simple>
            <to uri="direct:c"/>
        </when>
        <otherwise>
            <to uri="direct:d"/>
        </otherwise>
    </choice>
</route>
- from:
    uri: direct:a
    steps:
      - choice:
          when:
            - simple: "${header.foo} == 'bar'"
              steps:
                - to:
                    uri: direct:b
            - simple: "${header.foo} == 'cheese'"
              steps:
                - to:
                    uri: direct:c
          otherwise:
            steps:
              - to:
                  uri: direct:d

Why can I not use otherwise in Java DSL

When using the Choice EIP in the Java DSL you may have a situation where the compiler will not accept when() or otherwise() statements.

For example as shown in the route below where we use the Load Balancer EIP inside the Choice EIP in the first when:

Code will not compile

from("direct:start")
    .choice()
        .when(body().contains("Camel"))
            .loadBalance().roundRobin().to("mock:foo").to("mock:bar")
        .otherwise()
            .to("mock:result");

Well the first issue is that the Load Balancer EIP uses the additional routing to know what to use in the load balancing. In this example that would be the:

.to("mock:foo").to("mock:bar")

To indicate when the balancing stops, you should use .end() to denote the end. So the route is updates as follows:

Code will still not compile

from("direct:start")
    .choice()
        .when(body().contains("Camel"))
            .loadBalance().roundRobin().to("mock:foo").to("mock:bar").end()
        .otherwise()
            .to("mock:result");

However, the code will still not compile.

The reason is we have stretched how far we can take the good old Java language in terms of DSL. In a more dynamic or modern language such as Kotlin or Groovy you would be able to let it be stack based, so the .end() will pop the last type of the stack, and you would return to the scope of the Choice EIP.

That’s not doable in Java. So we need to help Java a bit, which you do by using .endChoice(), which tells Camel to "pop the stack" and return to the scope of the Choice EIP.

Code compiles

from("direct:start")
    .choice()
        .when(body().contains("Camel"))
            .loadBalance().roundRobin().to("mock:foo").to("mock:bar").endChoice()
        .otherwise()
            .to("mock:result");

You only need to use .endChoice() when using certain EIPs which often have additional methods to configure or as part of the EIP itself. For example the Split EIP has a sub-route which denotes the routing of each split message. You would also have to use .endChoice() to indicate the end of the sub-route and to return to the Choice EIP.

Still problems

If there are still problems, then you can split your route into multiple routes, and link them together using the Direct component.

There can be some combinations of EIPs that can hit limits in how far we can take the fluent builder DSL with generics you can do in Java programming language.

Precondition Mode

In precondition mode, the Choice EIP is an optimized Content Based Router which selects a single branch (when/otherwise) during startup, and always executes the same branch. This allows to optimize the runtime Camel to avoid this evaluation process for every message; because they are supposed to always be routed on the same branch.

Because the Choice EIP in precondition mode evaluates the predicates during startup, then the predicates cannot be based on the content of the message. Therefore, the predicates would often be based on property placeholders, JVM system properties, or OS Environment variables.

The Choice EIP in precondition mode combined with Route Templates allows for more flexible templates, as the template parameters can be used as the predicates in the Choice EIP; meaning that the Choice EIP in precondition mode is fully parameterized, but is optimized for best runtime performance.

Example

The Camel Simple language is great to use with the Choice EIP in precondition mode to select a specific branch based on property placeholders.

Here we select from the Switch the first predicate that matches. So if there is a property placeholder with the key foo then its select, and so on. Notice how we can use {{?foo}} to mark the property placeholder as optional.

  • Java

  • XML

  • YAML

from("direct:a")
    .choice().precondition()
        .when(simple("{{?foo}}")).to("direct:foo")
        .when(simple("{{?bar}}")).to("direct:bar")
        .otherwise().to("direct:other");
<route>
    <from uri="direct:a"/>
    <choice precondition="true">
        <when>
            <simple>{{?foo}}</simple>
            <to uri="direct:foo"/>
        </when>
        <when>
            <simple>{{?bar}}</simple>
            <to uri="direct:bar"/>
        </when>
        <otherwise>
            <to uri="direct:other"/>
        </otherwise>
    </choice>
</route>
- from:
    uri: "direct:a"
    steps:
      - choice:
          precondition: true
          when:
            - simple: "{{?foo}}"
              steps:
                - to: "direct:foo"
            - simple: "{{?bar}}"
              steps:
                - to: "direct:bar"
          otherwise:
            steps:
              - to: "direct:other"
Otherwise, is optional, and if none of the predicates would match, then no branches is selected.